Forward: For a systematic, detailed, professional exposure of
Scientology's "Narconon" front group, visit the
Narconon Exposed web site.
[NOTE: After it was discovered that Scientology's NarCONon is a quack
medical fraud with no scientific basis, the crooks were thrown out
of our children's schools. There's no telling how much damage the
norotious cult did to the kids who were subjected to their frauds.]
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/06/14/EDGD56NAAR1.DTL
Sabotaging drug 'education' in S.F. public schools
Pseudoscience and misinformation plague many efforts to keep young
people off drugs. These errors destroy our credibility with teens and
sabotage drug-abuse prevention immensely. As Nanette Asimov documented
in The Chronicle ("What Narconon tells students," June 9) our
children hear outrageous ideas as early as the third grade. My personal
favorite: Drugs will store in your fat cells forever but niacin and
saunas will release their remnants as colored ooze.
Programs that rely on lies such as these make me very pessimistic. I
wish this example of misinformation was an isolated slip, but as a
drug researcher I hear comparable tales daily. A recent e-mail from a
boy in Danville explained how his teacher held up a peanut to the
class to emphasize the size to which their testicles would shrivel if
they smoked marijuana. (I hesitate to think what the girls in the
class must have thought.)
Students in my undergraduate course on drugs and human behavior also
heard some real whoppers growing up. A woman from Texas learned that 1
in 3 people who try marijuana become heroin addicts. (The actual
number is 1 in 333, according to the federal Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration.) The health instructor of a boy
from Southern California explained that a single puff of marijuana
would later cause debilitating flashbacks. These flashbacks allegedly
would force his eyes back in his head as he fell to the floor babbling
during job interviews. A woman from Alaska had a DARE program police
officer threaten to arrest her uncle who successfully used marijuana
to battle chemotherapy-related nausea because "medical marijuana is a
myth." Obviously, research does not support the claims of these
drug-prevention approaches.
The drug myths don't just surface at school. Our own tax dollars
financed an elaborate and expensive series of television commercials,
radio spots and billboards from the Office of National Drug Control
Policy in 2003. Every semester I hear students laugh heartily as they
ridicule this campaign, which linked marijuana to terrorism, date rape
and the accidental shooting of a friend. Obviously, data don't support
these assertions, either. We're clearly so scared of teens hurting
themselves that we don't know what to do.
We're all willing to do anything to prevent teen drug problems. We've
spent billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of hours at work
and in school. And we should. Drug problems are a debilitating and
preventable waste. But we shouldn't lie. Lying hurts our credibility
and actually creates more problems than it solves.
Teens know markedly more than we give them credit for, especially when
drugs are involved. They're excellent detectors of our little fibs,
too. They need only turn to their friends to learn that shrunken
testicles, heroin addiction and flashbacks are not the destiny of
every marijuana user. These lies don't make them fear the drug. But
they do make them suspicious of everything else we say.
Exaggerations about the negative effects of drugs boomerang, making
more trouble rather than less. More than once a student has told me a
story along the lines of: "When I realized that marijuana didn't lead
to crack, I figured everything else they said was a lie, too. That's
why I went ahead and snorted glue." This predicament is extremely
unfortunate. Inhalants are dangerous, with the potential to damage the
brain. But what teen would believe it from the fraud who gave them
this other misinformation?
Fortunately, not all drug prevention programs resort to these tactics.
Those that focus on the truth actually show great success:
-- The Safety First campaign in San Francisco emphasizes that,
although abstinence is best, most teens experiment with drugs, so
information on how to call for help when problems arise is
dramatically better than repetitions of "Just say no."
-- UP FRONT, a program based in Oakland, builds confidential
relationships with teens so they can discuss the concerns about drugs
that matter to them most.
-- Project Toward No Tobacco Use in Los Angeles corrects young
people's overestimates of how many of their peers smoke and teaches
them to dispute glamorized media depictions of cigarettes.
Programs like these give me hope. Replacing the Narconon presentations
with one of these could make a huge difference in our schools. The
simple strategy of telling the truth is the best way to keep our
children from developing drug problems. Let's give it a try.
Mitch Earleywine is an associate professor of psychology at the
University of Southern California and author of "Understanding
Marijuana" (Oxford University Press, 2002).
The name "Narconon"® is trademarked to the Scientology
organization through one of their many front groups. The name
"Scientology"® is also trademarked to the "Church"
of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the
individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the
dangers of the Narconon scam are members of or representitives of the
Scientology organization.
If you or a loved one needs help -- real help -- there are
a number of rehabilitation programs you can contact. The real
Narcotics Anonymous organization
can get you in touch with real people who can help you.
Click [HERE] to visit Narcotivs
Anonymous's web site. Narcotics Anonymous's telephone number is
1 (818) 773-9999.
Return to The NarCONon exposure's main Index page.
Mitch Earleywine
Monday, June 14, 2004
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of
the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may
not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.